Home coaching changed babies' bottle habits. Cavities and weight? No clear change.

People say: “Coaching parents early should protect kids' teeth and weight” We read the study.

What they did

Randomised controlled trial (RCT). 350 mothers and babies. about 12 months per family (enrolled at child age ~6 months, final follow-up 12 months after baseline, at ~18 months of age); enrolment 2017-2020, data collection Dec 2017 - Dec 2021.

A trial. Chance decided who did what.

Who: 350 low-income South Asian immigrant mothers (born in India, Pakistan or Bangladesh; the abstract says Bangladeshi) and their ~6-month-old babies on Medicaid/CHIP, recruited in the Bronx, Queens and New Jersey via pediatric practices and the community group Sapna NYC; 176 coached, 174 leaflets; 44 lost to follow-up (87.42% retention)

What they found
  • Yearly bottle drop-74%vs -42% leaflets
  • Saw a dentist37%vs 4% leaflets
  • Cavities or weightnoneno clear change
The catch

More to know, from our read of the paper:

  • Behaviour outcomes (bottle/sippy cup use, diet, toothbrushing, dental visits) are SELF-REPORTED by mothers; say 'moms reported'
  • Clinical outcomes showed no clear difference: visible caries 9.09% coached vs 3.13% leaflets (p = 0.27) and weight gain velocity (p = 0.60). Say 'no clear change', never 'coaching doesn't work for teeth'
  • Authors say caries prevalence was 'extremely low', so the intra-oral camera may have missed cavities; COVID-19 moved data collection to phone from March 2020 and weights came partly from pediatric cards / mothers' reports; 18 months of age may be too short to see weight effects
  • Intervention delivery was not blinded; the planned family-member visits (husbands, mothers-in-law) were dropped because relatives were hard to engage
  • The '74% vs 42% yearly decline' comes from a Poisson mixed model rate ratio (0.36 vs 0.58 per year), adjusted for many baseline covariates; cross-sectional medians at 18 months (7 vs 14 per week) were not significantly different alone (p = 0.11). Use the paper's own '74% vs 42%' wording
The verdict

Habits changed. Teeth and weight: no clear change.

In short

A randomized trial followed 350 low-income South Asian immigrant mothers in the New York area and their 6-month-old babies for about a year. Half got six home visits and six calls from community health workers; half got leaflets. Mothers in the coached group reported bottle and sippy cup use falling 74% a year vs 42%, and 37% of coached babies saw a dentist vs 4%. But cavities and weight gain showed no clear difference; the authors point to a short follow-up and pandemic-era measuring problems.

The video
The paper

Debnath A, Bonuck K, Gao Q, Ramachandran U, Gaur S, Custodio-Lumsden CL, Kopycka-Kedzierawski DT, Kim M, Karasz A (2026). The CHALO! Study Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial to Reduce Risk of Childhood Dental Caries and Obesity. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.

Design: Randomised controlled trial (RCT) · two-arm randomized controlled trial (1:1, computer-randomized, sealed envelopes); data collectors blinded, intervention delivery not blinded; registered NCT03077425

DOI: 10.3390/ijerph23070837

Goals:

How we checked

We read the abstract and the full text of this paper and checked every number on this page against it (17 facts, checked on 2026-10-29). The study design is named above. Cohort and other observational studies are described as linked, not proven. Found an error? Email theis@onestudyaday.com.

Join the waitlist: one checked study a day for your goal, by email

Pick up to three goals. We email you once when the daily study starts. The goals for this study are ticked already.