Can hugs keep germs away? Scientists checked!
People say: “Hugs don't do anything” We read the study.
Observational study. 404 people. 14 consecutive evening phone interviews, then (1-3 weeks later) nasal virus drops and 5-6 days of hotel quarantine; antibodies re-checked ~28 days after exposure.
The scientists only watched the habit. Nobody was told what to do. A clue, not proof.
Who: Healthy adults aged 18-55 (mean 33.5) from the Pittsburgh area, pooled from two viral-challenge studies (2000-2004, n=193; 2007-2011, n=213); 46.3% women, 38.4% non-white; only people with low prior immunity to the challenge virus were eligible
- Few hugsMorearguing: caught the germ more
- Lots of hugsSamearguing didn't matter
- Runny coldSamehugs or no hugs
Nobody was told to hug.
More to know, from our read of the paper:
- Observational for the exposure: nobody was told to hug more; hug frequency was self-reported as a single yes/no question ('did anyone hug you today?') per evening call. Not 'hugs prevent colds' but 'people who got hugged more often were less likely to get infected'
- The outcome that held up was INFECTION (virus found in nose wash or 4-fold antibody rise), and less nasal congestion among the infected. Hugs were NOT linked to getting a clinical cold (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.48-2.16, p=0.96), and NOT to mucus amount (p=0.83)
- Several results are borderline (hug main effect p=0.04; nasal clearance p=0.044, beta -0.13, explaining ~1.3% of variance). Small effects, wide CIs (OR 0.39, CI 0.16-0.96)
- Lab-style cold model in healthy 18-55-year-olds with low immunity to the virus, given a deliberately high-infection-rate inoculation (78% infected); not real-world colds, not children/older adults
- Archival re-analysis of two older trials (data 2000-2011) combined after the fact
A clue. Not proof.
- Hug someone who likes hugs!
404 healthy adults (18–55) told a caller every evening for 2 weeks whether they had argued with someone and whether anyone hugged them. Then scientists dripped cold germs into their noses and kept them in a hotel. In people with few hugs, more arguing went with catching the germ more often; with lots of hugs, arguing did not seem to matter. Hugs did not change who got a full, runny cold. Nobody was told to hug (an observational study with a viral challenge), so this is a clue, not proof.
Cohen et al. (2015). Does hugging provide stress-buffering social support? A study of susceptibility to upper respiratory infection and illness. Psychological Science.
Design: Observational study · prospective observational study with an experimental viral challenge: hugs were NOT assigned, only counted beforehand; everyone was then given a cold virus (linked, not proven)
Goals:
We read the abstract and the full text of this paper and checked every number on this page against it (19 facts, checked on 2026-10-03). The study design is named above. Cohort and other observational studies are described as linked, not proven. Found an error? Email theis@onestudyaday.com.
Join the waitlist: one checked study a day for your goal, by email
Pick up to three goals. We email you once when the daily study starts. The goals for this study are ticked already.