19,806 people · England

An hour a week in nature? Linked to nothing.

People say: “Any time outdoors helps” We read the study.

What they did

Cross-sectional study. 19,806 people. single interview; nature contact recalled for the last 7 days; survey waves 2014/15-2015/16.

One snapshot in time. Nobody was told what to do. A clue, not proof.

Who: Adults (16+) in England from Monitor of Engagement with the Natural Environment (MENE) survey waves 6-7, face-to-face home interviews, weighted to be nationally representative of the adult population of England

What they found
  • Good health, under 2 hnoneno link vs zero minutes
  • Good health, 2–3 h+59%higher odds
  • Beyond 200–300 minno gainbenefit flattened

120–179 min a week in nature: 59% higher odds of good health vs none. Under 120 min: no link

The catch

It held even below exercise guidelines.

More to know, from our read of the paper:

  • Observational and cross-sectional: authors cannot rule out that healthier, happier people simply spend more time in nature
  • Everything self-reported: health is one question ('How is your health in general?'), well-being is one life-satisfaction question, and minutes in nature are recalled
  • Weekly minutes are an estimate: number of visits last week multiplied by the length of ONE randomly selected visit
  • The 120-minute 'threshold' may partly be an artefact: answers cluster at the hour mark (78% of the 120-179 band answered exactly 120 min); authors call threshold and peak 'tentative' and 'starting points for discussion... than clearly established findings'
  • Time in nature explained only ~1% of the variance in health or well-being (unadjusted models)
The verdict

2 hours a week: linked to better health. Not proven.

One thing to try
  1. Aim for 120 min a weekBelow that, no link was found.
  2. Split it any wayOne long visit or several short ones: same.
  3. No gym neededIt held for people not meeting exercise guidelines.
In short

19,806 adults in England: minutes in nature last week vs self-rated health. Under 120 minutes: no link. The authors call the threshold tentative, and one survey can't rule out that healthier people simply go outside more. Linked, not proven.

The paper

White et al. (2019). Spending at least 120 minutes a week in nature is associated with good health and wellbeing. Scientific Reports.

Design: Cross-sectional study · cross-sectional survey analysis (linked, not proven)

DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-44097-3

Goals:

Better mood
How we checked

We read the abstract and the full text of this paper and checked every number on this page against it (20 facts, checked on 2026-10-01). The study design is named above. Cohort and other observational studies are described as linked, not proven. Found an error? Email theis@onestudyaday.com.

Join the waitlist: one checked study a day for your goal, by email

Pick up to three goals. We email you once when the daily study starts. The goals for this study are ticked already.